The United States is home to the world’s largest economy, though relatively recent policy rollouts by current U.S. President Donald J. Trump – namely slapping tariffs on virtually everything shipped between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China – cause some to think that the leader of the so-called “home of the brave” might not want to brave a globalized economy in favor of staying largely within the States’ own borders in true nationalist form.
Although Trump seems to be applying the pressure against the People’s Republic of China’s failure to stop the purposeful extortion committed by Chinese manufacturers – in order to get the low-cost, high-quality, outsourced Chinese manufacturing, virtually all businesses are required to relinquish all of their intellectual property – of Americans for their world-class intellectual property, the issues between the two countries are likely caused by misunderstanding or a feeling that each side is inherently against one another.
In most cases of international turmoil, country leaders simply are afraid of working things out with one another or they don’t know how to do so properly
Professor Kamil Idris is a master of international law – Kamil Idris even holds a doctoral degree in the field of generalized international law – and is skilled in scavenging relationships from the shreds of substance left after spicy, rotten international relations.
One thing that Professor Kamil Idris is particularly worried about is recent sentiments from the European Union and its member states regarding not wanting to engage in trade relationships with the United States and its businesses because of what’s currently going on between current United States President Donald Trump’s playground and China.
Here’s why Trump kicked off those tariffs in the first place
Enforcing international intellectual property law is one of the most difficult facets of business law to enforce. American businesses willingly go to China and actively try to outsource their various needs to Chinese manufacturers – the former already know that they’ll have to give up intellectual property. Even if Chinese businesses were robbing their American counterparts blind, enforcement of laws regarding IP that currently does not exist in China is incredibly difficult.